SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 613

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
Ramesh Gaikwad – Appellant
Versus
N. S. Prakasham – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Ch. Janardhan Reddy.
For the Respondents: V.S. Somayajulu.

ORDER :

B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

1. The revision petitioners are the claim petitioners in EA No. 79 of 2013 in EP No. 121 of 2008 in OS No. 1675 of 2001 and alongwith the claim petition, they filed a stay application in EA No. 78 of 2013. They are claiming through Judgment Debtor (for short 'J. Dr.') as pendente lite alienees. The EA No. 79 of 2013 was ended in dismissal and to restore the same, EA No. 177 of 2016 was filed and the same was ended in dismissal on merits on 28.4.2016 by order of the Executing Court-cum-VII Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad and impugning the same, present revision is maintained. The suit OS No. 1675 of 2001 was filed on 30.8.2001 by the plaintiff by name, N.S. Prakasam (revision 1st respondent-cum-Decree Holder (for short 'D. Hr.') of OS No. 1675 of 2001) against V. Dasarath (revision 2nd respondent J. Dr.), for specific performance of the contract for sale and the suit was decreed, ex parte with a direction to the defendant to receive the balance sale consideration and execute sale deed within 30 days from date of said decree in favour of the plaintiff and to pay costs.

2. It is pursuant to said decree, the revision 1st respondent D. Hr. ob



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top