SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 131

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.
T. Muralidhar Rao and Ors. – Appellants
Vs.
State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors. – Respondents
Writ Petition No. 1974 of 2012
Decided On : 23-02-2017

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : B. Nalin Kumar, Counsel

Headnote:

Constitution of India - Articles 21, 14, 14 and 300-A - provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6, 8 (3), 8 (4), 9, 10 (1), 20 (1) (a) - Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Repeal Act, 1999 – Section 10 (6), 8 (4) - Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1952 - Section 7(2) - Petitioner challenges the proceedings No. G-of the Special Officer and Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling as without jurisdiction null and void and of Articles of the Constitution of India and the provisions of Urban Land Act and seeks a consequential direction to restrain the State of and the Special Officer and Competent Authority Urban Land Ceiling Authority from interfering with their possession and enjoyment - Registered sale deed for this entire land divided the land into plots after obtaining layout permission - Filed Statement under Section of the Act declaring the above land in their family holding - Statement under Section of the Act was prepared showing that yards of land in the hands of B.V. was surplus land - This was served on the declarant under Section of the Act – Held, Petitioners are in possession of the subject land as on the date of filing of the Writ petition notwithstanding the alleged drawn upon by the officials of the respondents - Respondents that in Plot Nos. which were also sold by of third parties a building having Door was located having been constructed long before and a Gas Agency by name Gas Agency was supplying – Proceedings purporting to take possession cannot be accepted as evidence of dispossession of petitioners and it has to be held that on the site, no proceedings were conducted that the petitioners did not deliver possession to any of the State Authorities, nor did the State Authorities approach them or take possession of the land - Steps can be initiated under the said Act to dispossess the petitioners or interfere with their possession and enjoyment of the subject land - Petition is allowed.

ORDER

M.S. Ramachandra Rao, J.

1. The petitioner challenges the proceedings in CC. No. G-1/4271/76 of the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling, Hyderabad (2nd respondent herein) as without jurisdiction, null and void and violative of Articles 14 and 300-A of the Constitution of India, and the provisions of Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 (for short, 'the Act') and seeks a consequential direction to restrain the State of Andhra Pradesh (1st respondent) and the Special Officer and Competent Authority, Urban Land Ceiling Authority from interfering with their possession and enjoyment over the Plot Nos. 351 and 320 in Sy. Nos. 96 and 97 at Block No. 13, Gokul Nagar, Marriguda, hamlet of Mallapur Village, Uppal Mandal, Rangareddy District. One Mohd. Rehman Ali and Mohd. Ali were the owners and possessors of an extent of Ac.24-345 guntas in Sy. Nos. 96 & 97 of Marriguda Village, Uppal Mandal, Hyderabad. On 18.3.1967 they executed a registered sale deed for this entire land in favour of one Yelamachili Nageswara Rao and five others. Later, they divided the land into plots, after obtaining layout permission from the Gram Panchayat.

2. Out of the above land, 5074 sq. yards comprised in Plot Nos. 361, 358, 359, 360, 371, 372, 380, 320 and 351 was sold under Registered Sale Deed Dt. 26.9.1967 by Y. Nageswara Rao to Mrs. Bandhakavi Suguna Rama Rao, W/o. B.V. Rama Rao (for short, 'Suguna Rama Rao').

3. After the Act coming into force, B.V. Rama Rao, husband of Suguna Rama Rao filed Statement under Section 6 of the Act declaring the above land in their family holding.

4. On 9.1.1978 draft statement under Section 8(1) of the Act was prepared showing that 4242.47 sq. yards of land in the hands of B.V. Rama Rao was surplus land. This was served on the declarant under Section 8 (3) of the Act, but the declarant did not choose to file any objections to the draft statement prepared by the 2nd respondent. Thereafter, no specific order under Section 8 (4) of the Act was passed by the 2nd respondent.

5. But noting was made in the file that the draft statement prepared under Section 8 (1) of the Act was confirmed. Thereafter, final statement under Section 9 of the Act was issued to the declarant on 24.1.1981. This was followed by notification under Section 10 (1) of the Act on 31.12.1982 in the name of Sri B.V. Rama Rao for acquiring extent of 4242.47 sq. yards.

6. In the mean time, the State Government, in exercise of its power under Section 20 (1) (a) of the Act issued G.O. Ms. No. 733, Revenue (UC.II) Department, dated 31.10.1988. It accorded:

"(a) exemption of the vacant land or the agricultural land and which is likely to be used for non-agricultural purposes at the option of the holder thereof, or both, to a maximum extent of five acres situated within the peripheral area as specified in Column (3) of Schedule-I to the Urban Land (Ceiling & Regulation) Act, 1976 of the Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration, Visakhapatnam Urban Agglomeration, Vijayawada Urban Agglomeration, Guntur and Warangal Agglomerations in excess of the ceiling limit, from the provisions of Chapter-III of the said Act; and

(b) permission to transfer any such land or part thereof by a person by way of sale, mortgage, gift, lease or otherwise, the extent of five acres of land in excess of ceiling limit, excluding the area required for roads, hospitals and for other public use."

7. Having regard to the above G.O. Ms. No. 733, Dt. 31.10.1988, wife of the declarant Smt. B. Suguna Rama Rao executed Registered Sale Deed Dt. 28.5.1998 selling plot Nos. 320 and 351 admeasuring 874 sq. yards in favour of Smt. Y. Sharada Devi. Clause (10) of the said Sale Deed clearly recited that the vendor owned land admeasuring 5074 sq. yards in the peripheral area of Hyderabad Urban Agglomeration, that after issue of G.O. Ms. No. 733, dated 31.10.1988 and availing of exemption granted therein, she had thus transferred 873 sq. yards through Registered Sale Deed Dt. 28.5.1998.

8. On















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top