SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 572

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Syed Sadullah Hussaini – Appellant
Versus
Syed Waliullah – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: M. Mehdi Husaain
For the Respondents: Mohammad Adnan, M.A. Mujeeb

JUDGMENT :

1. This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filled challenging the Order, dated 04.05.2016 in I.A.No.173 of 2016 in I.A.No.17 of 2016 in O.S.No.2 of 2016 on the file of the Court of Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Tribunal (for short, ‘the Tribunal’), whereby the Tribunal granted police aid for implementation if interim order dated 20.10.2016 in I.A.No.17 of 2016 in I.A.No.17 of 2016 granting ad-interim injunction restraining the respondents, who are the revision petitioners, and their men from inferring with the Management of Shairgul, Mitti Ka Sher, Hyderabad.

2. It is the contention of the revision petitioners that the Tribunal granted ad-interim injunction in I.A.No.17 of 2016 on 20.01.2016 restraining with the Management of Darga Hazarath Noorullah Hussain. Later the revision petitioners appeared before the Tribunal and sought time for filling counter. But unfortunately, counsel for the respondents before the Tribunal reported no instructions. By the impugned order, the Tribunal ordered application on 04.05.2016 granting police aid.

3. But the revision petitioners filed a petition to set aside the ex parte Order, which is at pre registration













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top