SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 618

A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
Narendra Agrawal – Appellant
Versus
Managing Director, Indian Immunologicals Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents: Vedula Srinivas

JUDGMENT :

1. The petitioner filed this Writ Petition through his counsel initially and later on argued the case in person. Heard the petitioner in person and the learned counsel for the respondents.

2. As per the averments in the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, the petitioner states that the respondent-Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of National Dairy Development Board and that of the Government of India. Thus, it is amenable to the jurisdiction of this Court. He further states that majority of the employees except the Managing Director are engaged on contract basis. The petitioner was appointed as Manager Grade-III in marketing department by a letter of appointment dated 02.03.2007. He was initially appointed for a period of three years with effect from 28.02.2007 and his services were stated to be terminable by giving one month notice or by paying one month salary in lieu of notice. He states that he joined the second respondent company after having qualified in B. Pharmacy and MBA. He was sponsored by the Company to undergo executive programme in Marke




















































































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top