SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(AP) 573

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
Shriram Chits Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
B. Durgaprasad Rao – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Maheswara Rao Kuncham

JUDGMENT :

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

1. This Civil Revision Petition arises out of order dated 12.11.2015 in E.A.No.186 of 2015 in E.P.No.178 of 2015 on the file of the Additional Junior Civil Judge, Kukatpally at Miyapur, Ranga Reddy District.

2. At the stage of considering C.R.P.M.P. No. 4147 of 2016 filed for condonation of delay, this Court ordered notices to all the respondents. The learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo vide U.S.R.No.5651 of 2016, wherein it is stated that the notices sent to respondent Nos.1 and 3 have been returned with the postal endorsement “not claimed” and the notice sent to respondent No.2 has been returned with the postal endorsement “unclaimed” and that respondent Nos.4 and 5 have received the notices under acknowledgment, but they have not entered appearance. This Court, therefore, condoned the delay while observing that as respondent Nos.1 to 3 have not claimed notices, they are deemed to have been served. Even today, no appearance has been made on behalf of any of the respondents.

3. We have heard Mr. Maheswara Rao Kuncham, learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.

4. The petitioner, a Chit Fund Company, has raised a disput






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top