Sanjay Kumar, J.

1. These two writ petitions arise out of the order dated 30.04.2015 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for brevity, ‘the Tribunal’), in O.A.No.407 of 2011. The said O.A. was filed by respondents 13 to 18 in W.P.No.25498 of 2016/respondents 12 to 17 in W.P.No.25502 of 2016. Ahmed Abdul Samee and P.Y. Ramachendram, petitioners in W.P.No.25498 of 2016, were arrayed as the fifth and fourth respondents respectively in this O.A. B. Prem Kumar, P.A. Venugopal and B. Vinay Kumar, petitioners in W.P.No.25502 of 2016 were shown as respondents 7, 9 and 10 respectively therein. N. Narasimhulu was the third respondent in the O.A. However, as there was no cause of action against him, he is a formal party to the writ petitions. Similarly, it emerged that there was no cause of action against D. Malleshwara Rao and D. Ramesh Chander, respondents 6 and 8 in the O.A. Thus, they are also formal parties. M. Ashok Reddy, respondent 11 in the O.A., against whom an adverse order was passed by the Tribunal, did not choose to challenge the same. As this Court does not propose to go into the validity of the order in so far as he is concerned, it is not nec