SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 209

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Pothuri Tulasi Das – Appellant
Versus
Pothuri Hari Prasad – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Respondents:K. Murali Krishna, Advocate

JUDGMENT :

1. This petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'C.P.C.') is filed by one Pothuri Tulasi Das (hereinafter referred to as 'the party-in- person/petitioner') to withdraw O.S.No. 62 of 2012 pending on the file of the Court of XIII Additional District Judge, Narsaraopet (for short, 'the Court below'), and transfer the same to City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

2. Though this Court is under obligation to marshal the facts but in view of the serious allegations made against the Presiding Officer and the entire judiciary of the State of Andhra Pradesh, it is apposite to extract the allegations made in the affidavit filed along with the petition for better appreciation of facts which are as under:

"I submit that the 1st respondent herein is my brother and the 2nd respondent herein is the wife of the 1st respondent. There is some property disputes between me and my brother and I filed suit O.S.No. 50 of 1985 on the file of the Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Narsaraopet for partition and the said suit was partly allowed allotting 1/3rd share to me. In fact, I am entitled for ½ share, as such I preferred appeal A.S.No. 2295 of 1998 and and the respondents herein file










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top