M. Seetharama Murti, J.

1. This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner seeking verbatim the following relief:

"... be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondent in not granting the benefit of regularization of services of the Petitioner on par with one Mr. Rajendar Kumar, B. Sudhakar Reddy and A.A.S. Venkateswara Swamy, and the attendant benefits of pay fixation from 1989 onwards as per the orders of the High Court in W.P. No. 3604 of 1997 dated 2-9-2004 as arbitrary, illegal and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequentially declare that the petitioner is entitled for regularization and fixation of pay on par with the above persons with effect from 1989 with all consequential benefits including Encashment of Earned Leave at the rate of 15 days every year and to pass such other order or orders as this Honourable High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case."

I have heard the submissions of Sri P.V. Ramana, learned counsel for the petitioner, and of Sri S. Parikshith, learned Standing Counsel for the