SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 350

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, T.RAJANI
Shriram Transport Finance Co. Ltd. , Kadapa – Appellant
Versus
S. Salauddin – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Mr. B. Vijaysen Reddy.

ORDER :

V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN,

The petitioner, who secured an award in their favour in an arbitration case, has come up with the above civil revision petition, challenging the rejection of their application by the executing Court for transmission of the award to the District Court, Kadapa.

2. Heard Mr. B. Vijaysen Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Notice was ordered in this revision petition way back on 12.09.2008. Service of notice on the respondents was completed long time ago. But, there is no appearance for the respondents.

4. The petitioner herein raised a dispute with regard to the amounts that became due and payable from the respondents and the dispute was referred to arbitration. The sole arbitrator passed an award on 04.04.2006 in Arbitration Case No.17 of 2015. The arbitration was held at Tirupati and the award was passed there.

5. Thereafter, the petitioner filed an execution application before the District Court, Chittoor, under Section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking transmission of the award to the District Court, Kadapa, on the ground that the properties, against which execution could proceed, were located within the territorial jurisdicti



























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top