V. Ramasubramanian, J.

The husband has come up with both the above appeals, questioning the correctness of a common judgment rendered by the Family Court in O.P.Nos.640 and 695 of 2006, dismissing his petition for divorce and allowing the petition of the wife for restitution of the conjugal rights.

2. During the pendency of the above appeals, the parties have entered into a compromise. Therefore, two miscellaneous petitions are filed, one each in the appeals, seeking to record the compromise.

3. Heard Ms. O. Sailaja, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, learned counsel for the respondent.

4. The joint memo of compromise filed by the parties reads as follows :

Memorandum of Agreement under Section 89 CPC read with Rule 336 of Civil Procedure Alternative Dispute Resolution and Civil Procedure Mediation Rules, 2006:

Whereas the marriage of above named parties was solemnized on 15-4-2001 as per Hindu religious customs and rites.

Whereas there were disputes between the parties resulting living separately since long time and the above named petitioner filed O.P. No.640 of 2006 on the file of the Court of the Judge, Family Court at Vijayawada for dissolutio