C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

As the subject matter is common in these appeals, they are heard and being disposed of together.

2. For convenience, the parties are hereinafter referred to as they are arrayed in C.M.A.No.564 of 2017.

3. We have heard Mr. Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. V. Ravinder Rao, learned senior counsel representing Mr. M. Jayaram Reddy, learned counsel for respondent No.1 and Mr. Altaf-Ur-Rahman, learned counsel representing Mr. K.K. Waghray, learned counsel for respondent Nos.3, 4 and 5.

4. Respondent No.1, who is the daughter of appellant No.1 and sister of appellant No.2, filed O.S.No.301 of 2016 for partition and separate possession of her 1/7th share in plaint A to D schedule properties. Respondent Nos.2 to 5 are the sisters of respondent No.1/plaintiff. It is the pleaded case of respondent No.1 that plaint A schedule property, which is a house in Malakpet, Hyderabad was purchased in the year 1969 by her father during his life time with his earnings in the name of his wife/appellant No.1. She has also pleaded that plaint B schedule property, which is an open land of 4512 sq.yds. was purchased by her father in his own name and that