SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 569

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO
BARAPATI SRILEKHA – Appellant
Versus
RAMACHANDRA REDDY PATOLLA – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:Mr. T. Pradyumna Kumar Reddy, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Public Prosecutor (TG)

ORDER :

B. Siva Sankara Rao, J.

The petitioner is the accused of Cr.No.1365 of 2015 of Rajendranagar Police Station registered originally under section 174CrPC on 22.12.2015 and later altered the Section of law for the offence punishable under Section 306 of I.P.C., on the report of the 1st respondent-defacto complainant and after investigation, the police on filing charge-sheet, the learned VIII Metropolitan Magistrate, Cyberabad at Upperpally, Rajendra Nagar, Ranga Reddy district, taken cognisance for the offence under Section 306 I.P.C. and numbered as PRC No.36 of 2016 to commit the case to the Court of Sessions.

2. The petitioner impugning the proceedings in said P.R.C.No.36 of 2016, filed this Criminal Petition with the contentions in the grounds of petition that her relative-deceased Dasaratha Reddy, loved her while she was a student but on the advice of the elders she concentrated on her studies and got selected in a campus by the reputed company. The deceased went to London and returned to India in 2014 as he could not stay there any further. On a complaint given by one Rambabu, HR, Meridian School, a case in Cr.No.600 of 2015 of Madhapur(Guttala) Police Station was registere










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top