SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 652

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
I. Ramesh Reddy – Appellant
Versus
S. H. O. , II Town (L&O) P. S. , Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sreenivasa Rao, Counsel

ORDER :

M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J.

1. The criminal revision case, under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ('the Code', for brevity), is filed by the petitioner/A6, paving been aggrieved of the order, dated 7.6.2017, of the learned VI Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Rajamahendravaram, passed in Crl. MP No. 2282 of 2017 in Crime No. 41 of 2014. I have heard the submissions of learned Counsel for the petitioner/A6, and of the learned Public Prosecutor (AP) appearing for the 2nd respondent-State. I have perused the material on record.

2. The facts narrated by the learned Counsel for the petitioner and the facts, which require consideration, in brief, are as follows:

"The petitioner/A6 is one of the accused in Crime No. 41 of 2014 of II Town (L&O) Police Station, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 285, 336, 438 read with 149 IPC and Sections 190(3), 184, 132(1), 179(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The petitioner/A6 was enlarged on bail. According to the petitioner, he is falsely implicated in the crime. Further, as the crime is under investigation, charge sheet/final report is not yet f







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top