SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 679

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Venkataiah – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmidevamma – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri J. Suresh Babu

ORDER :

1. This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful respondents-defendants is directed against the order, dated 15.09.2017, of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet, passed in I.A.No.284 of 2017 in O.S.No.20 of 2010.

2. At the stage of admission, I have heard the submissions of Sri J. Suresh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants. I have perused the material record.

3. The facts, which are required to be stated as a prelude to this order, are as follows:

“Respondents/plaintiffs brought the suit against the petitioners/defendants for partition of the suit schedule property into two equal and equitable shares and allotment of one such separated share to the respondents/plaintiffs. The petitioners/ defendants filed written statement resisting the suit. The suit is at the advanced stage of trial. At that stage, the respondents/ plaintiffs filed the subject application, under Order XIV Rule 5(1) read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, requesting the trial Court to frame the following additional issues:

“1. Whether the suit schedule properties are the self acquired properties of Late Ramanna, S/o. Venkann










Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top