M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Venkataiah – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmidevamma – Respondent
1. This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful respondents-defendants is directed against the order, dated 15.09.2017, of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Narayanpet, passed in I.A.No.284 of 2017 in O.S.No.20 of 2010.
2. At the stage of admission, I have heard the submissions of Sri J. Suresh Babu, learned counsel for the petitioners-defendants. I have perused the material record.
3. The facts, which are required to be stated as a prelude to this order, are as follows:
“Respondents/plaintiffs brought the suit against the petitioners/defendants for partition of the suit schedule property into two equal and equitable shares and allotment of one such separated share to the respondents/plaintiffs. The petitioners/ defendants filed written statement resisting the suit. The suit is at the advanced stage of trial. At that stage, the respondents/ plaintiffs filed the subject application, under Order XIV Rule 5(1) read with Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, requesting the trial Court to frame the following additional issues:
“1. Whether the suit schedule properties are the self acquired properties of Late Ramanna, S/o. Venkann
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.