C.R.P.Nos.4204 and 4216 of 2017 maintained by the respondent-tenant-Smt. A.P. Leela of R.C.No.149 of 2008, whereas C.R.P.Nos.4205 and 4212 of 2017 are similarly filed by the respondent-tenant-Sri N. Sunder Raj of R.C.No.148 of 2008. The respective alleged landlords are by names N. Kishore Yadav in R.C.No.149 of 2008 and N. Sudarshan Yadav in R.C.No.148 of 2008.

2. It is the eviction petitions under A.P. Buildings (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control Act, 1960 (for short, the Act) were maintained on the grounds of personal requirement, willful default in payment of rent and denial of title. The Rent Controller in both the petitions from the respective evidence after contest from full-fledged trial/enquiry having held that the dispute as to identity raised by the tenant is not tenable, however, the respective landlord could not prove that there is jural relationship of landlord and tenant in seeking eviction. Consequently, against the dismissal orders from the so-called relationship landlord-tenant must pre-exist, even property identity not in dispute, the landlord-N. Kishore Yadav maintained R.A.No.88 of 2012 against dismissal of the eviction petition in R.C.No.149 of 2008 and t