SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2017 Supreme(AP) 727

B.SIVA SANKARA RAO, J.UMA DEVI
Areshanapalli Kesavulu @ Kesava Rao – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Sri D. Kodanda Rami Reddy

JUDGMENT :

B. SIVA SANKARA RAO, J.

1. The appellants are accused Nos.1 and 2 of S.C.No.78 of 2010 on the file of the learned VI Additional District and Sessions Judge, Markapur of Prakasam District, they were convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 392 IPC to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- each respectively with default sentence of six months in each for the offence under Section 302 IPC and seven years rigorous imprisonment with fine of Rs.5,000/- each with default sentence of six months each for the offence under Section 392 IPC and by giving set off of the period of remand and in ordering to run the said sentences concurrently. Impugning the said conviction judgment, dated 18.11.2011, by the learned Sessions Judge, these two appeals are maintained.

2. Heard both sides and perused the material on record placed before the trial Court covered by the evidence of PWs.1 to 19 and Exs.P.1 to P.49, M.Os.1 to 16, there is no independent evidence adduced by the accused and no documents marked on behalf of the accused and no documents even filed much less any statement by the accused during Section 313 Cr.P.C. examination from the prosecution in












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top