SANJAY KUMAR, P.KESHAVA RAO
Mandava Krishna Chaitanya – Appellant
Versus
UCO Bank, Asset Management Branch – Respondent
SANJAY KUMAR, J.
1. The petitioner is an auction purchaser. He seeks a direction to the UCO Bank, Asset Management Branch, Hyderabad (hereinafter, the bank), to refund the sale consideration of Rs.4,80,44,000/- paid by him, with interest at 18% per annum, by declaring the auction sale held by it in relation to Plot No.13, admeasuring 425 square yards with a house constructed thereon, bearing Door No. 1-89/6/2/5 in Survey Nos.43 to 47 and 49-part of Madhapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, as illegal.
2. Facts, to the extent germane, are as follows: The bank published mega e-auction sale notice dated 25.07.2016 in daily newspapers on 27.07.2016. Thereunder, it also proposed to sell the subject property, which it held as a secured asset. The reserve price fixed for its sale was Rs.4,34,44,000/-. The petitioner participated in the auction held on 29.08.2016 and emerged the highest bidder for this item of property at Rs.4,80,44,000/-. Having paid 25% of the bid amount on the date of the sale, he deposited the balance sale consideration on 12.09.2016. Aggrieved by this sale, M/s.V.G.Constructions, the borrower, filed an application under Section 17 of the Sec
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.