1. The respondents in these two civil revision petitions are the legal heirs of one R.K. Mahesh. The said R.K. Mahesh filed a suit in O.S.No.1177 of 2006 on the file of the VII Additional Senior Civil Judge, Vijayawada against one G.S.H. Prasad, who is arrayed as the 6th respondent in these two revisions. The suit was for recovery of possession. The suit in O.S.No.1177 of 2006 filed by R.K. Mahesh against G.S.H. Prasad, arose under very peculiar circumstances.

2. It appears that the landlord R.K. Mahesh let out the plaint schedule property to one G.C.M. Banerjee for non-residential purposes long time ago. The landlord (R.K. Mahesh) initiated proceedings for eviction against the said G.C.M. Banerjee in O.S.No.143 of 1994. But the suit was dismissed on the ground that the quit notice issued under Section 106 was not a valid one and also on the ground that the tenant was a company by name Associated Automotive Sales Private Limited, represented by Sri G.C.M. Banerjee.

3. Thereafter, the landlord R.K. Mahesh issued a fresh quit notice as against two companies, viz., Associated Automotive Sales Private Limited and Associated Auto Service Private Limited, and then came up with a fre