M. Seetharama Murti, J.

This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, by the unsuccessful petitioners/defendants 15 and 16, is directed against the orders, dated 07.09.2017, of the learned Additional Judge-cum-VI Senior Civil Judge, City Small Causes Court, Hyderabad, passed in I.A. No. 355 of 2017 in O.S. No. 189 of 2002 filed under Order 6, Rule 17 read with section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ('the Code') to permit them to amend the written statement filed by the deceased 1st defendant, which they have adopted, by adding paragraph 13(A) after the paragraph 13 in the original written statement of the deceased 1st defendant, as stated in the petition list.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri Mirza Nisar Ahmed Baig Nizami, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioners/defendants 15 and 16; and of Sri C. Shiv Lal, learned counsel appearing for the 4th respondent. I have perused the material record.

3. To begin with, it is to be noted that the plaintiff brought the suit against the defendants for partition of the suit schedule property into five equal and equitable shares by metes and bounds and for allotment of one such s