SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 193

P.V.SANJAY KUMAR, J.UMA DEVI
POCHIRAJU INDUSTRIES LTD. – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. J. Ugra Narasimha, Counsel.
For the Respondent: Mr. Ambadipudi Satyanarayana, Counsel, Mr. Ch. Ramesh Babu, Counsel.

ORDER :

P.V. SANJAY KUMAR, J.

1. Proceedings initiated by the Punjab National Bank (hereinafter, 'the bank') against the petitioner company under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity, 'the SARFAESI Act') culminated in the 'E-auction Sale Notice to General Public' dated 01.07.2017, whereby the bank proposed to auction the petitioner company's properties, viz., the land admeasuring Ac.3.86 cents at Kolthur Village, Shameerpet Mandal, Ranga Reddy District, with buildings and plant & machinery, for realization of its dues, on 24.07.2017. The present writ petition was filed challenging this notice.

2. By order dated 20.07.2017, this Court observed that as the petitioner had come at the eleventh hour, no reason was made out to grant stay of the sale proposed to be held on 24.07.2017, but in the light of the allegation that the bank had undervalued the property, this Court directed it to receive 25% of the bid amount in the event a sale materialized on 24.07.2017 but restrained it from confirming the sale or















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top