SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 252

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.UMA DEVI
Aijaz Ahmed @ Mohd. Sharfuddin, S/o. Mohd. Qutubuddin – Appellant
Versus
Union of India, Rep. by Secretary of Ministry for Home Affairs – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. M.Ram Reddy
For the Respondents: Mr. N.Naveen Kumar

ORDER:

V.Ramasubramanian, J.

The petitioner has come up with the above writ petition seeking a declaration that the failure of the 6th respondent/ Station House Officer, Malakpet Police Station, to register a FIR against the respondents 7 to 14 despite the orders of the learned VII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate in Sr.No.683 of 2018, dated 22-02-2018, is illegal and also to declare the action of the 8th respondent/Deputy Commissioner of Police and his subordinates in harassing the petitioner and his family members as illegal.

2. Heard Mr. M.Ram Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleaders (GAD) and (Home) and Mr. Naveen Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents 7 to 9.

3. The averments with which the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition are that the petitioner is doing the job of a Translator for the past 25 years; that a person by name R.Srinivas, who is the 10th respondent herein, used to come to his office regularly for translation of some Urdu documents; that in May-June, 2017, the 10th respondent along with some Police pe























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top