SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 334

SANJAY KUMAR
Achanta Chaya Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri V. Narasimha Goud.

ORDER :

1. The plaintiff in OS(SR).No.3276 of 2018 on the file of the learned II Additional Junior Civil Judge-cum-XVIII Metropolitan Magistrate at Malkajgiri, Ranga Reddy District, filed this revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution aggrieved by the return of her plaint on the ground of non-compliance with Section 80 CPC.

2. OS(SR).No.3276 of 2018 was filed by the petitioner-plaintiff seeking a declaration that the sale deed bearing Document No.2221 of 2002 dated 29.04.2002 executed in favour of defendant 9 in respect of the suit schedule property was null and void. She also sought a permanent injunction restraining defendants 8 and 9 from interfering with her peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit schedule property. Plot No.7, admeasuring 300 square yards in Sy.Nos.404 and 405, Srinivas Nagar Colony, Rampally Village and Gram Panchayat, Keesara Mandal, Medchal-Malkajgiri District (Ranga Reddy Judicial District), is the suit schedule property.

3. For reasons best known to her, the petitioner-plaintiff added the State of Telangana represented by its Inspector General, Stamps and Registration, Hyderabad; the District Registrar, Medchal-Malkajgiri District; the Sub

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top