SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 361

CHALLA KODANDA RAM
Rajesh Himathlal Ajmera – Appellant
Versus
Chadalavada Infratech Limited – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioners: Sri Ch. Ramesh Babu
For the Respondent: Sri Y. Raveendra Kumar

ORDER :

1. Since, on same set of facts, except a change in the amount due to the respondent, similar relief has been claimed, both these Company Petitions have been heard together and disposed of by this common order.

2. For convenience sake, the facts narrated in Company Petition No. 269 of 2014 are referred to.

3. Petitioners are partners of unregistered partnership firm, namely, M/s. Devang Electricals. Respondent is a Company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 (for short the Act), engaged in the business of execution of engineering contracts and construction works. The petitioners firm claims to have supplied various goods to the respondent under different purchase orders.

4. As the respondent failed to pay the amount due with respect to the said supplies, the petitioners firm got issued a statutory notice, dated 30.12.2013 under Section 434 of the Act calling upon it to pay the amount due and further cautioning that in the event of non-payment of due amount, it would be constrained to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Section 434 of the Act. In spite of the same, the respondent neither gave reply nor denied the legal demand, as such, the petitioners filed this Comp













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top