SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 420

M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Chejerla Srilakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Chejerla Ramesh Babu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Unnam Muralidhar Rao.

ORDER :

1. This petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, CPC) is filed by the petitioner-wife to withdraw FCOP No. 1787 of 2017 pending on the file of the learned Judge, Family Court, Visakhapatnam (for short, the Court at Visakhapatnam) and transfer the same to Senior Civil Judge's Court, Kandukuru, Prakasam District (for short, the Court at Kandukuru), on the ground that she is an indigent person having no means to meet the expenses for traveling and other incidental expenses and that she cannot undertake journey covering distance of more than 600 kilometers to appear before the Court at Visakhapatnam. At the hearing, learned Counsel for the petitioner reiterated the same grounds and placed reliance on the judgment of the apex Court in T. Gayatri Devi vs. Tallepaneni Sreekanth, 2013 LAWS 830 (SC), to contend that the Court can withdraw the pending O.P. from the Court at Visakhapatnam and transfer the same to the Court at Kandukuru as the petitioner is residing at Kandukuru basing on the convenience of both parties and that when the respondent is residing at a far of place i.e. at Hyderabad by attending to his employment, filing of the O.P. at Visakhapat























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top