SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 430

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
S. Mariamma – Appellant
Versus
APSRTC – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : S.M. Subhan
For the Respondent: Aravala Rama Rao, SC

ORDER :

U. DURGA PRASAD RAO, J.

1. The writ petitioner herein prays the Court for issuance of writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondents in removing her from service vide proceedings No. 02/95(71)/JMD dt. 06.01.1999 by the 3rd respondent and the proceedings No. PA/20A(40)/99-RMC dt. 23.06.1999 passed by the 2nd respondent denying her past service benefits as illegal, unjust, arbitrary and to set aside the same with a consequential direction to reinstate her from the date of charge sheet and to regularise her services on par with her batch mates w.e.f. 01.01.1998 with all consequential benefits. Briefly stating the petitioners' case is thus:

(a) The petitioner was appointed as Conductor in 1996 and working as such on route Jammalamadugu to Gandikota; while so, on 06.08.1999, when she was conducting service to the vehicle No. 3620, the checking officials of HES/TTP conducted check at Stage No. 3 and found ticketless passengers and issued charge memo on the ground that though she collected Rs. 3/- from the passenger, failed to issue ticket for which she filed her explanation; being not satisfied with the explanation offered by her, the respondent authorities kept her out of dut



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top