M. Seetharama Murti, J.

This revision petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner - 1st defendant assailing the order, dated 14.09.2018, of the learned Principal District Judge, Prakasam District, Ongole, passed in IA.No.1955 of 2018 in OS.No.32 of 2004.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri M.R.S. Srinivas, learned counsel appearing for the revision petitioner - 1st defendant, and of Sri G. Pedda Babu, learned senior counsel, on caveat, appearing for the 1st respondent - 4th defendant.

2.1 As this Court is inclined to dispose of the revision petition at the stage of admission, no notices are ordered to the 3rd respondent - 2nd plaintiff and other respondents - defendants in the suit.

3. The facts, which are necessary to be stated as a prelude to this order, in brief, are as follows:

The sole plaintiff brought the suit against the defendant, who is his son, for partition of the plaint schedule properties, inter alia, alleging that the plaintiff and the defendant are entitled to a half share each in the plaint schedule properties. The defendant filed a written statement and is resisting the suit. On the death of the sole plaintiff, his