SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 575

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, T.RAJANI
P. Suneela – Appellant
Versus
Shaik Kamal – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Kota Subba Rao, Adv., T. Mahender Rao, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

C.Praveen Kumar, J.

Aggrieved by the award and decree dated 17.06.2013 passed in M.V.O.P.No.125 of 2011 on the file of the Chairman, Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-I Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Secunderabad, wherein the Tribunal dismissed the claim of the claimants, the present appeal is filed by the claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 (for short the Act).

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties will hereinafter be referred to as arrayed in M.V.O.P.

3. The facts in issue are as under:

The appellants herein are the claimants. The first claimant is the wife and claimant Nos.2 and 3 are the two minor daughters while claimant No.4 is the father of one P.Ganesh Reddy (hereinafter referred to as the deceased). A claim-petition under Section 166 of the Act, claiming compensation of Rs. 36,00,000/-, came to be filed stating that on 18.10.2010 at about 5.30 p.m., while the deceased was proceeding on his motor cycle bearing registration No. AP 28 BD 4622 slowly on the extreme left side of the road from JNTU towards Hitech City and when he reached near RTO Office, 4th phase, KPHB Colony, the driver of an auto bearing registration No. AP 28




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top