C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, T.RAJANI
Harpreet Singh Chhabra – Appellant
Versus
Suneet Kaur Sahney – Respondent
C.Praveen Kumar, J.
The termination of the mandate of the Arbitrator due to non-completion of the arbitration proceedings within the time fixed by the High Court, is the subject matter of challenge in the present case.
2. Heard Sri S.Ravi, learned Senior Counsel appearing for Sri M.V.Pratap Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri Sandeep Sharma, for Sri B.Chandrsen Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
3. By an order dated 29.12.2017, the Judge, Commercial Court-cum-XXIV Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, while terminating the mandate of the arbitrator directed the parties to approach the Hon'ble High Court for appointment of an arbitrator, under Section 15 (2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short "the Arbitration Act"). Assailing the same, the petitioners herein initially filed an appeal under Section 13 (1) of the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division and Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, 2015 (for short "the Commercial Courts Act") on 05.03.2018 after obtaining a certified copy of the Order. Though the appeal was numbered, but realizing that an appeal will not lie against the said
Bhupinder Singh Bindra v. Union of India and another
Coal India Ltd. and Others v. Saroj Kumar Mishra
Jayesh H.Pandya v. Subhtex India Limited
L. Chandra Kumar vs. Union of India & others
Mascon Multiservices and Consultants Private Limited vs. Bharat Oman Refineries Limited
Shalini Shyam Shetty and another v. Rajendra Shankar Patil
Shyam Telecom Ltd., v. Arm Ltd
State of Arunachal Pradesh v. Subhash Projects and Marketing Limited
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.