SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 595

V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.UMA DEVI
Vijay Goutam Dabbiru – Appellant
Versus
Honble High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad for State of Telangana and State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
C.V. Mohan Reddy, Adv., M.V. Subba Reddy, Adv., S. Sri Ram, Adv., P. Kiran, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

V. Ramasubramanian, J.

The petitioner, who appeared for selection to the post of District Judge (Entry Level) under the quota reserved for direct recruitment, has come up with the above writ petition, challenging the action of the High Court in inviting the 7th respondent to appear for viva voce and also the action of the Registry in selecting the 7th respondent to the post of District Judge (Entry Level), as against an unreserved vacancy.

2. Heard Mr. C.V. Mohan Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr. S. Sri Ram, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 and Mr. P. Kiran, learned counsel appearing for the 7th respondent.

3. By a notification dated 15.04.2017, applications were invited for appointment to four posts of District Judges (Entry Level) by way of direct recruitment. Out of those four posts, one was reserved for Scheduled Tribes; one was reserved for the candidates belonging to BC (B) category and the remaining two were unreserved. However, out of the remaining two unreserved posts, one was intended to be filled by w














































Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top