SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 447

C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, G.SHYAM PRASAD
G. Srikantha – Appellant
Versus
P. V. Prasad Rao – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:B. Naresh Kumar Reddy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy, J.

1. This Writ Petition is filed for issue of Certiorari to quash Order, dated 23-01-2017, in FAIA(SR).No.3087 of 2016 in FA.No.117 of 2016 on the file of respondent No.3-Telangana State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Hyderabad (for short ‘the State Commission’). Though notice has been served on respondent No.2, no one entered appearance.

2. We have heard Mr.B.Naresh Kumar Reddy, learned Counsel for the petitioners, and perused the record.

3. The petitioners have filed CC.No.212 of 2008 in the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Ranga Reddy (for short ‘the District Forum’), to direct the deceased respondent No.1 to refund a sum of Rs.6 lakhs with interest @ 18% p.a., from the date of payment till the date of realisation; to award a sum of Rs.1 lakh towards mental agony and sufferance; and also to pay a sum of Rs.10,000/- towards damages and costs. The said CC was partly allowed by directing refund of the sum of Rs.6 lakhs with interest @ 6% p.a., from the date of complaint i.e., 01-12-2008 till the date of realisation. Feeling aggrieved by the quantum of interest and the period for which the same was ordered, the petitioners have filed








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top