SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(AP) 459

M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
Chinthalaphani Pavani – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner:K.S. Murthy, Advocate.
For the Respondent:G.P. for Revenue (TG), P.S.P., Suresh Kumarm Advocate.

JUDGMENT :

1. This writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, is filed by the petitioner requesting to grant a Writ in the nature of Certiorari and set aside the order, dated 16.06.2015, in Rc.No.E5/482/2014 passed by the Joint Collector, Warangal - 2nd respondent after calling for records related to the said case. By the said orders, the Joint Collector confirmed the order, dated 07.12.2013, of the 3rd respondent – Revenue Divisional Officer, Warangal, in file in Rc.No.A/8112/2012.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri K.S. Murthy, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner, of the learned Government Pleader for Revenue (TG), appearing for the respondents 1 to 4, and of Sri P.S.P. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondents 5 to 14. I have perused the material record.

3. This Court, on 22.04.2016, while admitting the writ petition, granted the following interim order in WPMP.No.17194 of 2016:

‘Pending further orders, status quo in all respects, including with reference to the nature of land and alienation in any manner, shall be maintain
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top