Sri. M. Seetharama Murti, J.

This civil revision petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India by the unsuccessful petitioners-defendants is directed against the order dated 02.05.2016 of the learned Junior Civil Judge, Kodangal, passed in IA.No.111 of 2016 in OS.No.20 of 2016 filed under Order 26, Rule 9 read with Section 75 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, (the Code, for brevity) requesting to appoint an advocate commissioner for local investigation of the suit plots in Sy.No.73/AA9 situate in Bomraspet village and Mandal and note down the physical features of the same.

2. I have heard the submissions of Sri S. Ashok Anand Kumar, learned counsel for the revision petitioners-defendants (the defendants, for brevity). Though the respondents-plaintiffs are served with notices, none appears. I have perused the material record.

3. The facts that lead to the filing of this revision may be stated, in brief, as follows:

The plaintiffs brought the suit for a perpetual injunction in respect of two plots of 50 Square yards and 60 Square yards in two items in Sy.No.73/AA9 of Bomraspet village and Mandal of Mahabubnagar District, inter alia, claiming that they are the absolut