K.J. Sengupta, J.

This appeal is sought to be preferred against the judgment and order of the learned Single Judge dated 19.09.2013 by which the reasoned order of the Joint Collector, Kadapa district, has been set aside.

2. The brief facts, which are necessary and relevant for disposal of this appeal, are set out hereunder.

3. The appellants before us being aggrieved by the order of the Tahsildar, has preferred appeal to the Revenue Divisional Officer and approached the Collector by filing revision impugning the order recording the rights of issuance of pattadar passbook. This took place long time back. However, the appellants before us thought it fit that they would get justice before Collector in the revisional jurisdiction.

4. The revisional authority being the Collector, after hearing all the parties interested held that the parties before him have raised the question of title and he, therefore, observed and recorded that he is not competent to decide the title. After observing so, he decided to cancel the passbooks. Being aggrieved by the said order, the writ petitioners approached the learned Single Judge questioning the order of the Collector. The learned Trial Judge,