RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J.

1. Heard Sri Vedula Srinivas, learned counsel for the appellants, learned Government Pleader for Home and Sri K.V. Simhadri, learned counsel for the 3rd respondent-writ petitioner. This appeal, under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, is preferred by respondent Nos. 3 and 4 in the writ petition, against the order passed by the learned Single Judge in Review W.P.M.P.No.34683 of 2017 in W.P.No.19570 of 2017 dated 21.9.2017.

2. The facts, to the limited extent necessary, are that the 3rd respondent-writ petitioner filed O.S.No.183 of 2015 before the Principal Junior Civil Judge, Sattenapalli, Guntur District seeking permanent injunction. He filed IA.No.851 of 2015, under Order 39 Rule I C.P.C, seeking interim injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the suit schedule ‘property. An order of temporary injunction was passed on 8.7.2015, which was made absolute more than two years thereafter on 18.7.2017. The appellants herein were heard before the interim order dated 08.07.2015 was made absolute on 18.07.2017.

3. While passing final orders in W.P.No.19570 of 2017 on 20.7.2017, the learned Single Judge was not made aware that the order of tem