M.SEETHARAMA MURTI
S. K. Yasin – Appellant
Versus
Depot Manager, APSRTC, Bhainsa Depot, Adilabad District – Respondent
M. SEETHARAMA MURTI, J.
1. The petitioner workman filed this writ petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to declare the final order, dated 10.10.1998, in Proceedings No. 01/2(6)/98-DM:BNS issued by the respondent as illegal, and arbitrary and set the same aside and grant the consequential benefits including arrears.
2. I have heard the submissions of Sri S.A.K. Mynuddin, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner and of Sri A. Ravi Babu, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-APSRTC (now TSRTC). I have perused the material record.
3. To begin with, it is appropriate to refer to the charge formulated against the petitioner, which reads thus:
For having driven the Vehicle No. AP 9Z 1517 in a rash and negligent manner without taking any precautionary measures while parking the vehicle on platform due to which one passenger who is waiting at Bus Station Bhainsa as a result of which injuries caused to the passenger at about 20.00 hours on 13.4.1998 while performing 12.00 hours Kubeer (S) service, which is a serious misconduct in terms of Reg. 28(ix) of APSRTC Employees (Conduct) Reg., 1963.
The penalty that was imposed without conducting a domestic enquiry re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.