2019 Supreme(AP) 33
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI
C. PRAVEEN KUMAR, M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, JJ.
Y.V. Murali Krishna – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration & Urban Development Department & Others – Respondents
W.P. (PIL) No. 365 of 2018
Decided On : 14-02-2019
For the Appellant : Mohammed Gayasuddin, Counsel.
For the Respondent: Nimmagadda Venkateswarlu, SC, Ramachandra Rao Gurram, SC.
Headnote:
Constitution of India, 1950 – Article 226 – Pro bono litigation – Seeking for declaration inaction of respondents in taking appropriate steps for ensuring that no unauthorized cutouts, flexi boards, banners and posters are displayed on main roads and main circles and immediate removal of unauthorized flexi boards/cut outs that have been erected within Gudiwada Municipal limits as illegal and arbitrary and violative of directions issued by High Court – Directions Issued – Held, Unauthorized banners/flexis/cutouts of any kind is allowed to continue, 4th respondent shall reap serious consequences that flow from such lethargic attitude of its officials for violation of such direction – Municipality further directed not to allow any unauthorized banners of any kind, subject to Section 114 to Section 118 of Act and exceptions contained therein and Rules 15, 16 & 18 of Rules thereof Municipality is directed to continue monitoring of removal of unauthorized flexes, banners etc by its subordinates –There is no need to continuously monitor proceedings by this Court, as 4th respondent removed unauthorized banners/flexis in substantial compliance of interim direction – Writ petition disposed of. (Para 36, 37 and 38)
Facts of the Case:
Seeking for declaration inaction of respondents in taking appropriate steps for ensuring that no unauthorized cutouts, flexi boards, banners and posters are displayed on main roads and main circles and immediate removal of unauthorized flexi boards/cut outs that have been erected within Gudiwada Municipal limits as illegal and arbitrary and violative of directions issued by High Court
Findings of the Case:
Unauthorized banners/flexis/cutouts of any kind is allowed to continue, 4th respondent shall reap serious consequences that flow from such lethargic attitude of its officials for violation of such direction – Municipality further directed not to allow any unauthorized banners of any kind, subject to Section 114 to Section 118 of Act and exceptions contained therein and Rules 15, 16 & 18 of Rules thereof Municipality is directed to continue monitoring of removal of unauthorized flexes, banners etc by its subordinates –There is no need to continuously monitor proceedings by this Court, as 4th respondent removed unauthorized banners/flexis in substantial compliance of interim direction.
Result: Writ petition disposed of
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
1. Sri Y.V. Murali Krishna, a public spirited person filed this pro bono litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to declare the inaction of the respondents in taking appropriate steps for ensuring that no unauthorized cutouts, flexi boards, banners and posters are displayed on the main roads and main circles and immediate removal of the unauthorized flexi boards/cut outs that have been erected within the Gudiwada Municipal limits as illegal and arbitrary and violative of directions issued by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad in W.P.No.28447 of 2008 dated 01.06.2015, issue direction to remove such flex boards etc.
2. The facts in brief are that, the petitioner is a resident of Gudiwada Town, Krishna District, he alleged that, in the recent past, hundreds of unauthorized flexi boards/banners arc being erected on the main roads of Gudiwada Town. It is submitted that the dividers on the main road, main circles and cross roads are being flooded with unauthorized flexi boards and banners purportedly to which celebrities/politicians on their birthday/festival days etc. Recently several flexi boards/banners have mushroomed at the main circles of Gudiwada Town i.e. Koganti Rajababaiah Chowk, Nehru Chowk, Vasavi Chowk. Mudedla Rama Rao Chowk. Market Centre, Gowri Shankar Talkies Centre, Kothi Bomma Centre and Vegetable Market Centre, to convey birthday wishes to the Chairman of the Gudiwada Municipality. It is also contended that, earlier plantations have been raised on the dividers on the main roads but recently banners have been affixed even to the plants and due to the use of binding’ wires for tying the banners, the plantation is being destroyed. Immediately, the petitioner submitted a representation dated 23.11.2018 to the Municipal Commissioner, requesting the officers to immediately remove the unauthorized flexi boards, etc., as they are causing inconvenience to the public commuting on the roads and also posing serious traffic hazards. The petitioner protested before the offices of the respondents, in order to sensitize them to remove the flexi boards and also submitted another representation dated 28.11.2018 to the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Gudiwada in this regard and also sent whatsapp messages to the Director, Municipal Administration, but, no positive steps have been taken till date for removal of the same.
3. In W.P.No.28447 of 2008, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad had taken a serious view of the unregulated erection of unauthorized flexi boards across the two States of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana and had issues specific direction to the authorities to ensure that no unauthorized cutouts, flexi boards, banners and posters are displayed and that, if any complaint is made by any of the citizens in this regard, the authorities are directed to take immediate action for removal of those unauthorized erections. Inspite of the directions issued by the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, the respondents remained as mute spectators on account of their patronage with highly placed persons in politics and therefore, inaction of the respondents is questioned and sought a direction stated supra.
4. The 4th respondent/Gudiwada Municipality, represented by its Commissioner filed counter, denying material allegations, inter alia contending that the 4th respondent is taking steps to remove unauthorized flexes/banners erected in the main roads in Gudiwada Municipality and also removed unauthorized cutouts in Gudiwada Munciipality. It is also submitted that, the Municipality initiated action to remove the banners and flexes when it noticed that some personnel erected banners and flexes without obtaining permissions from the municipality for birthday celebration function of M.L.A Gudivada and thereafter, removed the banners/flexes pursuant to the orders of High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad in W.P.No.28447 of 2018. It is submitted that, banners/flexi boards have be