D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Poreddy Venkata Narisireddy – Appellant
Versus
Mukkamala Venkata Narasamma – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, J.
1. This appeal is filed questioning the judgment and decree dated 16.03.1998 in OS. No. 293 of 1989 by the Principal Senior Civil Judge, Narsaraopet.
2. The suit was filed by the plaintiff for partition of the suit schedule property into five equal shares, but subsequently amended to four equal shares and the allotment of one such share to the plaintiff. In addition, future mesne profits are also sought.
3. For the sake of convenience, the parties are referred to as they are arrayed in the suit only.
4. The plaintiff in the suit is one Smt. M. Venkata Narasamma. She has filed a very brief plaint. According to the plaint, the plaintiff, defendant Nos. 3 and 4 are the daughters of defendant No. 1. Defendant No. 2 is the son of defendant No. 1 and brother of the plaintiff and defendant Nos. 3 and 4. They are all the children of P. Veerareddy and defendant No. 1. Thus, defendant No. 1 is the mother of the plaintiff and of defendant Nos. 2 to 4. According to the plaint, P. Veera Reddy died on 03.02.1970. Therefore, the plaintiff and the defendants are entitled to a 1/5th share; subsequently amended to 1/4th share. The schedule property is the self acquired
B.L. Sreedhar v. K.M. Munireddy
Depuru Veeraraghava Reddi v. Depuru Kamalamma
Hari Shankar Singhania v. Gaur Hari Singhania
Janki Vashdeo Bhojwani v. Indusind Bank Ltd.
Natubhai Chotabhai Patel v. Smt. Patnam Shakuntala
Podelly Chinna Chinnanna vs. Bandari Pedda Bhumanna
Privy Council. In Kanhai Lal v. Brij
Smt. P.N. Wankudre v. C.S. Wankudre
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.