SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 98

U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
G. Nagamani – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : D. Srinivas.
For the Respondents: Government Pleader.

ORDER :

U. Durga Prasad Rao, J.

1. The petitioners seek a writ of mandamus declaring the inaction of official respondents in registering the FIR on the complaint, dated 2.2.2019 made by the petitioners, as arbitrary, illegal, unconstitutional and against the spirit of the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Lalita Kumari v. Government of Uttar Pradesh and others, 2014 (1) ALD (Crl.) 159 (SC) : (2014) 2 SCC 1 and for a consequential direction to respondent No. 5 to register the FIR against respondent Nos. 6 to 9.

2. When the matter came up for hearing, learned Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the complaint of petitioner No. 1 was registered as Crime No. 176 of 2019, dated 14.7.2019, by the Police of Annavaram P.S. for the offences under Sections 447, 506, 509 and 436 read with 34 of I.P.C. In proof of registration of the F.I.R., he produced a copy of the F.I.R. in Crime No. 176 of 2019, dated 14.7.2019. However, learned Counsel for the petitioners taking the Court through the date of complaint mentioned in the F.I.R. as 14.7.2019, would vehemently contend that in fact the complaint was given by the petitioners on 2.2.2019 itself and they also sent a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top