ORDER :

D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU, J.

1. This civil miscellaneous appeal itself is taken up for hearing with the consent of the learned Counsel for the appellants. Despite service, respondents did not appear. This Court held that there is deemed service to respondents 3, 4 and 5. Service was effected on respondents 1 and 2. The 1st and 2nd respondents did not appear.

2. The record was reconstructed with the permission of the Hon'ble the Acting Chief Justice.

3. The CMA is filed against the order, dated 3.10.2018, passed in IA No. 194 of 2017 in OS No. 68 of 2017 by the IV Additional District Judge, Tirupati. The suit in OS No. 68 of 2017 is filed by Sri Puvvadi Subramanyam and his wife Puvvadi Lakshmi against Jangam Jayalakshmi and four others for a permanent injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiffs' peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaints A and B schedule properties. The parties are described as arrayed in the suit in the lower Court.

4. The case of the appellants-plaintiffs is that the plaint A-Schedule property has been purchased by the 1st plaintiff from the 1st defendant. The plaint B-Schedule property was purchased by the 2nd plaintiff from the