M.SEETHARAMA MURTI, J.UMA DEVI
Meridian Promoters P. Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. Seetharama Murti, J.
1. This appeal, under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, is directed against the order, dated 26.12.2018, in ITA. no. 449/VIZ/2017, passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Visakhapatnam "SMC" Bench, Visakhapatnam.
2. We have heard the submissions of Sri Bendi Raviteja, learned counsel, appearing for the appellant; and, of Ms. M. Kiranmayee, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondent. We have perused the material record.
3. The facts, which lead to the filing of this appeal, are as follows: The appellant is company engaged in the business of construction works. It filed its original return of income for the assessment year 2008-09, on 07.10.2008. The case was taken up for scrutiny. Notice under Section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ['the Act', for short] was first issued. Subsequently, notice under Section 142(1) of the Act was issued. Ultimately, the respondent had disallowed Rs. 37,23,478/- inter alia for the reason that the appellant had not produced sufficient information and/or the information produced by the appellant is not acceptable. When the appellant submitted the vouchers for the said amount claimed by the appell
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.