M.VENKATA RAMANA
Katari Seetha Rama Raju – Appellant
Versus
Ranganadha Swamy Temple – Respondent
ORDER :
M. VENKATA RAMANA, J.
1. This Civil miscellaneous appeal is preferred against the order of AP. Endowments Tribunal in O.A. No. 01 of 2006, dated 30.05.2019.
2. The appellant is the second respondent, the first respondent is the petitioner and whereas the second respondent is the first respondent in O.A. No. 01 of 2006 on the file of the A.P. Endowments Tribunal at Pedakakani.
3. The first respondent is a public religious temple notified under Section 6 (c) (ii) of A.P. Charitable and Hindu Religious Institutions and Endowments Act, 1987 (for short 'Act 30 of 1987'). This temple has several properties including the disputed dry land covering an extent of Ac. 1.82½ cents in S. No. 63/1 at Gudilova Village, Anandapuram Mandal, Visakhapatnam District. It was stated in the application by the first respondent-temple, filed under Section 83 (1) of Act 30 of 1987, that the appellant had encroached upon the above land and being in illegal occupation, has been running a brick industry there, without approval from any competent authority. Thus, it was claimed that there has been a change in the use of the land adversely affecting its fertility. Claiming further that the appellant failed t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.