SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 163

G.SHYAM PRASAD
Kameswaramma – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : T. Niranjan.
For the Respondent: G. Seshadri.

ORDER :

1. This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to issue a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the six respondent in trying to evict the petitioner from her agricultural lands situated in Survey No. 90 to an extent of Ac. 1.00 cents Katta No. 318, Fasli 1425 situated at Vardhanenipalem village, Jarugumalli Mandal, Prakasam District, as illegal and arbitrary.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the 6th respondent is trying to evict the petitioner from her agricultural land admeasuring Ac. 1.00 which belongs to her husband, without following due process of law.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that without issuing any notice, the respondents are pressuring the petitioners to vacate the said land. Therefore, the petitioner has approached this Court.

4. It is also the case of the petitioner that in the year 2016, a meeting has been conducted in the Grampanchayat office by the 6th respondent and a resolution was passed with regard to erection of community water plant at her village, basing on the resolution. The 3rd respondent-Chief Executive Officer, District Panchayat Office, Prakasam District vide proceedings in Rc. No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top