SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 219

G.SHYAM PRASAD
M. Narayana – Appellant
Versus
M. Saidulu – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant: Nimmagadda Satyanarayana
For the Respondents: S.A.V. Ratnam

ORDER :

G. Shyam Prasad, J.

1. This appeal is directed against the decree and order dated 28.6.2006 passed in OP No. 266 of 2003 by the Chairman, Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-cum-IV Additional District Judge, (Fast Track Court) Ongole.

2. The brief facts of the case are that the petition filed under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act by the legal representatives of the deceased for compensation on account of the death of the deceased in a motor accident occurred on 18.1.2003 claiming compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/-. The deceased alongwith her husband and other family members proceeding in a car bearing No. AP 9S 5599 to Hyderabad, and reached near Sambasivaraopeta, a lorry bearing No. AAG 993 came in opposite direction and dashed against the car. The deceased received injuries in the accident and died on the spot. The husband of the deceased committed suicide later. A case in Crime No. 17 of 2003 was registered against the driver of the lorry. The deceased was doing saree business and earning Rs. 10,000/- per month by the date of the accident. The petitioners 1 and 2 are the g

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top