SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(AP) 240

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Ranjan Nayak – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : G. Venkata Reddy, Adv.

JUDGMENT :

D.V.S.S. Somayajulu, J.

1. This criminal petition is filed Sections 437 and 439 Cr.P.C., seeking bail to the petitioners/Accused Nos. 3, 5, 6 and 7 in Cr. No. 76 of 2019 on the file of Anandapuram Police Station, Visakhapatnam. The accused are charged of an offence under Section 20(b) and (c) of the NDPS Act.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners in this case are merely engaged as coolies and drivers and that they are not at all actively involved in the commission of the offence.

3. Learned Public Prosecutor on the other hand submits that it cannot be said that the accused in this case are driver and collies. He submits that a reading of the mediators report clearly shows that they were they were aware of the crime and that Ganja is being transported. He submits that huge quantity of 300 kgs of Ganja has been seized. He points out that A.3 (petitioner No. 1) clearly stated that he was engaged for the purpose of transporting Ganja. Similarly, A.5 also states that he was aware that the Ganja is being purchased and it should be transported. Even in the statements of A.6 and A.7, it is clearly stated that for the purpose of loading Ganja they would

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top