NINALA JAYASURYA
P. Vasanth Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
ORDER :
(Heard and pronounced through Blue Jeans App(virtual) mode, since this mode is adopted on account of prevalence of COVID-19 Pandemic).
1. The Writ Petition is filed seeking to declare the order of the 3rd respondent issued in R.C.No.391/2019/C1 dated 27.04.2020 as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, without jurisdiction and consequently direct the 3rd respondent to permit the petitioner to conduct the business and pass such other orders as deemed fit.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise appearing for the respondents and with their consent, the present Writ Petition is disposed off, keeping in view the legal issues raised in the present Writ Petition and the relevant precedents governing the same.
3. This is a second round of litigation. The petitioner is a Form 2B license holder to run a Bar and Restaurant as per the provisions of the A.P. Excise (Grant of License of Selling by Bar and Conditions of License) Rules, 2017 and he is conducting the business in the name and style of P.V.R.Restaurant and Bar at Kadiri.
4. As seen from the affidavit filed in support of the Writ Petition, e
Board of Trustees of Martyr Memorial Trust and another v. Union of India and another
Hindustan Times Limited v. Union of India
Jawahar Lal Singh v. Naresh Singh and others
Siemens Engineering and Manufacturing Co., of India Ltd. v. Union of India and another
West Bengal Central School Service Commission v. Abdul Halim
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.