SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 115

C.PRAVEEN KUMAR
Syed Nawabjan – Appellant
Versus
Santhinikethan Trust – Respondent


ORDER :

1. The present Appeal is filed by the Claimants under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, challenging the Order, dated 18.05.2007, passed in O.P. No. 39 of 2005 by the learned Principal Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (District Judge, Nellore), wherein, the application filed by the Petitioners under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, seeking compensation of Rs. 5,00,000/- due to death of Syed Ahamad Basha [the ‘deceased’] was dismissed.

2. The averments, in the claim petition, are as under:-

    (i) The Claimant No. 1 and 2 are said to be patents of the deceased, while, Claimant No. 3 to 5 are sister and brothers of deceased. The 1st Respondent is the owner and the 2nd Respondent is the insurer of the offending vehicle.

(ii) According to Claimants, the deceased was working as a Goldsmith under a Gold Merchant in Nellore and earning Rs. 200/- per day. It is said that, on 01.09.2004 at about 12.30 PM, when the deceased was lying in-front of the R.R. Channel near D.S.R. Government Headquarters Hospital, Nellore, a Van bearing No. AP-31/W-8218 [vehicle] driven by its driver in a rash and negligent manner at high speed, hit the deceased and ran over his legs. The deceased was aged

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top