SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 154

D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
Boppana Surendra – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
Vajjhala Satyanarayana Prasad.

JUDGMENT :

D.V.S.S. SOMAYAJULU, J.

1. This Criminal Petition is filed by the petitioner-accused to quash all further proceedings relating to Crime No. 230 of 2019 of Pattabhipuram Police Station. The petitioner before this Court is Accused No. 2 in Crime No. 230 of 2019.

2. This Crime No. 230 of 2019 was registered on 02.07.2019 for an alleged offence that took place on 31.12.2018. Sri V. Satyanarayana Parasad, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner points out that this is a case of pure abuse of the process of the Court. He points out that a crime was registered on 02.07.2019 for an alleged offence that occurred on 31.12.2018. Relying on para-5 of the FIR, learned counsel points out that the police station is 2 kms. away from the scene of offence. He says that there is absolutely no ground to explain the delay. He also points-out that the case falls within the exception of an inherently improbable case. He points-out that a reading of the complaint shows that the offence occurred on 31.12.2018 on which date a judgment was to be delivered in C.C. No. 237 of 2018. Thereafter, after the delivery of the judgment at about 12 noon, the accused-supposedly attacked the complainant and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top