CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
S. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Neerukonda Subba Rao – Respondent
ORDER :
1. Since the parties in both these Civil Revision Petitions are one and the same and as both these petitions arise out of the orders passed for eviction of the tenant on the ground of committing default in payment of maktha, both these Civil Revision Petitions were heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.
2. C.R.P.No.2450 of 2011 arises out of the order dated 23.11.2010 passed in A.T.A.No.8 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District, whereunder, the order dated 21.03.2006 passed in ATC No.18 of 1999 on the file of the Special Officer-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinaga, for eviction was confirmed. ATC No.18 of 1999 was filed by the petitioner-landlord for eviction of the respondent, who is the tenant, from the petition schedule property on the ground that he committed default in payment of maktha for the years 1997-98 and 1998-99. The said ATC No.18 of 1999 was allowed and the tenant was ordered to be evicted from the petition schedule property. Appeal preferred thereagainst in ATA No.8 of2006 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, was dismissed on 23.11.2010 by the impugned
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.