SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2020 Supreme(AP) 298

CHEEKATI MANAVENDRANATH ROY
S. Vijayalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Neerukonda Subba Rao – Respondent


ORDER :

1. Since the parties in both these Civil Revision Petitions are one and the same and as both these petitions arise out of the orders passed for eviction of the tenant on the ground of committing default in payment of maktha, both these Civil Revision Petitions were heard together and they are being disposed of by this common order.

2. C.R.P.No.2450 of 2011 arises out of the order dated 23.11.2010 passed in A.T.A.No.8 of 2006 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, East Godavari District, whereunder, the order dated 21.03.2006 passed in ATC No.18 of 1999 on the file of the Special Officer-cum-Principal Junior Civil Judge, Kakinaga, for eviction was confirmed. ATC No.18 of 1999 was filed by the petitioner-landlord for eviction of the respondent, who is the tenant, from the petition schedule property on the ground that he committed default in payment of maktha for the years 1997-98 and 1998-99. The said ATC No.18 of 1999 was allowed and the tenant was ordered to be evicted from the petition schedule property. Appeal preferred thereagainst in ATA No.8 of2006 on the file of the III Additional District Judge, Kakinada, was dismissed on 23.11.2010 by the impugned

    Click Here to Read the rest of this document
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    SupremeToday Portrait Ad
    supreme today icon
    logo-black

    An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

    Please visit our Training & Support
    Center or Contact Us for assistance

    qr

    Scan Me!

    India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

    For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

    whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
    whatsapp-icon Back to top