M.VENKATA RAMANA
Pathapati Yanadi Redd – Appellant
Versus
Nukalapati Subbamma – Respondent
ORDER :
M. Venkata Ramana, J.
1. The defendant is the petitioner. The respondent is the plaintiff.
2. The respondent, as the plaintiff, filed the suit for permanent injunction against the petitioner restraining him from interfering with her possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property and for costs.
3. The property in dispute is described in plaint schedule as a vacant site of 90 ankanams within the specific boundaries. It shall be referred to, hereinafter, as, 'the suit site'.
4. The rough sketch is also appended to the plaint giving description of the suit site. It is shown as 'A B C D E F G H I' in the sketch. It consists of a regular slabbed house and a tiled portion as well as cattle shed, apart from vacant site.
5. The petitioner is claiming his right, title and interest to a part of the suit site shown as 'A B C I' in the rough sketch.
6. The claim of the respondent, as seen from the plaint, is that her husband Sri late Nukalapati Ramachandra Reddy had purchased the suit site in the year 1981, paying entire sale consideration of Rs. 30,000/- on 1.8.1981 from Sri late Puchalapalli Seetharami Reddy and in respect thereof evidencing the transaction on 31.10.1981, the owner
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.