C.PRAVEEN KUMAR, M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Nallagonda Rama Gopal – Appellant
Versus
Government of Andhra Pradesh – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
M. Satyanarayana Murthy, J.
1. Nallagonda Rama Gopal working as a Medical Officer filed this Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India under pro bono publico, seeking relief of writ of mandamus, declaring the inaction of the 2nd respondent in permitting the 3rd respondent to continue to provide standard services in the dialysis centre is violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India, and consequently cancel the contract of the 3rd respondent and blacklist the 3rd respondent from participating in any tenders or providing such similar services in the near future.
2. The petitioner is a doctor by profession and now working as Medical Officer in Government Hospital at Gudipala Village, Chittoor District. The petitioner was diagnosed with chronic kidney disease and suffering from Hypertension and diabetes and he was directed to undergo dialysis on a regular basis by the doctors at the hospital of 2nd respondent-Sri Venkateswara Institute of Medical Sciences (for short 'SVIMS') and as such, he underwent dialysis at the 2nd respon
Tata Cellular v. Union of India
Raunaq International Ltd. v. I.V.R. Construction Ltd.
Air India Limited v. Cochin International Airport Ltd.
Karnataka SIIDC Ltd. v. Cavalet India Ltd.
Master Marine Services (P) Ltd. v. Metcalfe & Hodgkinson (P) Ltd.
B.S.N. Joshi & Sons Ltd. v. Nair Coal Services Ltd.
Jagdish Mandal v. State of Orissa
Michigan Rubber (India) Ltd. v. State of Karnataka and others
Paschim Banga Khet Mazdoor Samity v. State of West Bengal
The Silppi Constructions Contractors v. The Union of India and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.